During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
在广州一家咖啡馆里，德国华裔导演杜耀豪向作家陈润庭提起，自己的外祖父母来自汕头。彼时陈润庭心中一动，他是汕头澄海人，冥冥中觉得，眼前人或许是同乡。后来，杜耀豪正式拜托陈润庭帮忙寻亲，证实了这一直觉。，推荐阅读heLLoword翻译官方下载获取更多信息
，更多细节参见体育直播
Algorithm W Step-by-Step, PLZoo。关于这个话题，下载安装 谷歌浏览器 开启极速安全的 上网之旅。提供了深入分析
Save StorySave this story